In light of recent advancements in generative artificial intelligence (AI), the capacity to direct AI prompts with specific artist’ names and styles has emerged, resulting in the generation of AI-created works bearing semblance to existing artistic compositions. While the incorporation of inspiration or ideas from original works generally falls within acceptable bounds under Copyright Law, instances wherein AI replicates the style and distinctive expression of original works, potentially competing in the market or capitalizing on the established reputation of the original creator, may impinge upon economic interests. The recent ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith highlights the difficulty in determining fair use when the use in question may compete with or serve as a substitute for the original work in the market. As the evolution of generative AI continues, imperative discourse is necessitated to navigate the delicate equilibrium between fostering human creativity and safeguarding the economic interests of creators.